Download the press review.

The post DE BERTI JACCHIA ADVISES ANDION CH4 IN THE €67 MILLION CREDIT FACILITY WITH GOLDMAN SACHS ALTERNATIVES appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

The European Union has an ambitious goal: to finance a new season of industrial and technological growth by leveraging citizens’ savings, estimated at around 8 trillion euros. But how can investment really be encouraged?

A possible answer comes from the North.
Sweden, for example, has introduced a system that simplifies life for investors and supports them in the long term: it’s called ISK (Investeringssparkonto), a special account that makes investing easier and more advantageous.

This approach fits into a broader cultural and entrepreneurial model: more innovation, greater focus on employee well-being, and a stronger culture of long-term thinking.

Massimo Caiazza, interviewed by il Bollettino, offers insightful perspectives on the Swedish model and the potential benefits it could bring to Italy and the rest of Europe.

READ THE FULL INTERVIEW

The post “SWEDEN: A MODEL OF SAVING AND INNOVATION” appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Introduction

With the introduction, in 2019, of the Italian Crisis and Insolvency Code (“CCII“), entrepreneurs, both collective and individual, are now required to establish an organizational, administrative, and accounting structure that is appropriate to the nature and size of the business “also in function of the timely detection of the business crisis and the loss of business continuity” in order to ” promptly adopt and implement one of the tools provided by the law to overcome the crisis and restore business continuity“. Although Article 2381 of the Italian Civil Code already mandated directors to establish an adequate organizational, administrative, and accounting governance structure, from 2019 onwards, entrepreneurs must comply with an enhanced formulation of these obligations. The so-called “adequate organizational structures” (hereafter also referred to as “Adequate Structures”) are now also significant for the early detection of signs of economic/financial imbalance within the business.

It is therefore essential for businesses of all sizes —small, medium, and large— to adopt, in accordance with the CCII (Article 3) and the new text of Article 2086 of the Civil Code, Adequate Structures that can promptly record any patrimonial and/or economic-financial imbalances and verify the sustainability of indebtedness within a twelve-month period.

Given the inability to address all issues related to Structures in this context, which would require a much longer discussion, today’s analysis will be limited to the main consequences of non-compliance with this duty, both in relation to bank-business relationships and in assessing the liability of those acting as company directors.

What is meant by “Adequate Organizational Structures”

As previously mentioned, the legislator has supplemented the general obligation of organization for entrepreneurs with the duty to establish Adequate Structures to promptly detect any signs of crisis and loss of business continuity. The aim is to identify the most suitable path for business recovery and avoid liquidation.

However, aside from specifying that these structures must be adequate in relation to the nature and size of the business, the law does not provide further details on the characteristics that such Adequate Structures should possess, leading to several interpretative doubts. It is indeed challenging, from a legal standpoint, to precisely determine when a structure can be considered “adequate”, given the difficulty in abstractly defining a model that could be efficient for all businesses.

In this perspective, the doctrine agrees that a key principle to consider is proportionality, even though this is not explicitly mentioned in the provisions of the CCII. It is undeniable that the concrete and correct modulation of an Adequate Structure cannot ignore the size of the business, its area of operation, its degree of development, and its financial/accounting situation.

In European Union law (Article 5, paragraph 4 of the Treaty on European Union, 2012), a rule is considered to achieve the principle of proportionality when it is (i) suitable/necessary to achieve the desired goal, and (ii) does not impose an excessive burden on the agent compared to the objective to be achieved.

Given this premise, the practical preparation and implementation of Adequate Structures, also in light of the most recent jurisprudence and the guidelines provided by the Italian National Research Foundation of Chartered Accountants, should be characterised by the following elements:

1. a grid of KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), for economic, financial, and asset management to anticipate the signs of a potential state of crisis;
2. a short and medium to long-term industrial and strategic plan;
3. an updated organizational chart and functional chart that accurately represent the business reality, including the structure of delegations and the assignment of powers for top managerial roles;
4. a comprehensive set of reports from the administrative body on the management performance and its foreseeable evolution;
5. the formulation of forecasts regarding the ability to meet significant payment obligations, and, where necessary, outlining in advance the actions to be taken in case of events that could compromise business continuity (e.g., top management succession plan); and
6. reports by the administrative body on new investments, which should not only compare the progress status with the expected one but also highlight any exogenous critical factors that could undermine their success.

Additionally, courts consider it appropriate to implement an efficient system for managing commercial credits (and related technical procedures aimed at minimizing the emergence of credit losses or payment delays), along with periodic reporting on the overall status of credits and other useful information for making correct decisions concerning business continuity.

Finally, it is essential to monitor certain tools, such as the cash flow statement, and conduct a thorough analysis of balance sheet items to promptly detect financial imbalances and keep the economic, financial, and asset situation of the business under control.

Adequate Structures in the Bank-Business Relationship

The issuance of the “Guidelines on Loan and Monitoring” (“LOM”) by the European Banking Authority (“EBA”), effective from 30 June 2021, has significantly impacted the bank-business relationship. Previously, creditworthiness analysis was almost entirely focused on the analysis of the financial situation derived from the historical data of the business contained in financial statements, along with self-liquidating credit lines and the quality of the portfolio. Now, the EBA mandates a much broader and detailed evaluation process, focused on adequate risk control that integrates commercial elements and business context analysis.

From this perspective, the role of the Adequate Structures becomes even more central, considering that they become an essential parameter to monitor in the dynamics between banks and businesses, particularly during the creditworthiness evaluation phase.

With the issuance of these guidelines, banks are required to update and adapt their infrastructures and loan monitoring models by 30 June 2024, adopting new creditworthiness evaluation methods based on both backward-looking analyses (aimed at analyzing historical and actual business data) and forward-looking analyses (to evaluate future business data and information). A significant part of this is the evaluation of the “source of repayment capacity” from regular operations, which should result from a multi-year plan.

In essence, what becomes relevant is the financial outlook of the business and the sustainability of income and cash flows with respect to the financing required, with the consequence that businesses will no longer be able to use only the simple balance sheet as the main source of information for the bank.

Hence, it is crucial for businesses to establish Adequate Structures to provide banks, which are engaged in forward-looking analysis, with the tools to evaluate creditworthiness and monitor the loans granted to businesses.

The importance for the financing party to focus on the organizational structure is increased, with particular attention to the cash flow generated by core operations, as it is the primary source designated for loan repayment and thus represents a form of “guarantee” for the bank. Indeed, in light of the guidelines, real guarantees lose their centrality, becoming a sort of ancillary tool and loss mitigation measure in the event of the borrower’s insolvency, but no longer sufficient to independently justify the granting of a loan.

Given what has been observed so far, and considering that the financial prospects of the business and the sustainability of cash flows in the medium/long term are now at the center of the bank-business relationship, it is reasonable to believe that only those entities with Adequate Structures capable of monitoring and somehow ensuring the solvency of the business will have greater access to credit and will be facilitated in their relationships with financial intermediaries.

Adequate Structures and Directors’ Liability

It is also necessary to examine the liability profiles for directors who fail to implement adequate structures due to inertia and/or negligence.

Regarding the failure to implement Adequate Structures, recent courts decisions agree that it constitutes a serious irregularity, sufficient to entail the removal of the directors and their replacement with a judicial administrator pursuant to Article 2409 of the Italian Civil Code (Trib. Milan 29 February 2024 and Trib. Catania 8 February 2023).

Similar rulings have been made by the Court of Cagliari (19 January 2022) and the Court of Venice (29 November 2022), which hold that the absence of Adequate Structures is sufficient to trigger the remedies provided under Article 2409 of the Civil Code mentioned above.

It is also worth mentioning a recent decision of 6 February 2024, in which the Court of Catanzaro reiterated, in line with the now consolidated orientation outlined above, that the total lack of Adequate Structures constitutes a serious management irregularity. It further specified that this irregularity is even more severe in businesses not in a state of crisis, given the forward-looking rationale underlying the entire discipline on Adequate Structures. This rationale aims to prevent a solvent business from unexpectedly finding itself in a situation of economic-financial imbalance, a rationale that the Tribunal emphasized and reinforced with this ruling.

While there do not seem to be any doubts as to the liability of directors who have not provided the business with any Adequate Structure, the situation is more complex for directors who, though not inactive, have adopted structures that later proved inadequate in preventing a crisis. On this point, the Court of Rome (on 15 and 24 September 2020) ruled on the applicability of the “business judgment rule”.

This rule enshrines the principle that management decisions made diligently by directors in the performance of their duties are not subject to any review of their merits. Consequently, while there is no question that the failure to adopt any organisational measures entails a liability of the administrative body, by applying the business judgment rule the adequacy must be assessed ex ante, according to criteria of reasonableness and diligence.

This ruling highlights even more the necessity for diligent directors to establish Adequate Structures. In the absence of such measures, there is a concrete risk of incurring liability for mala gestio.

Conclusions

Although the subject matter discussed in this contribution is of recent implementation and evolving, the work of the legislator is sufficiently clear, allowing the identification of key points in both the CCII discipline and the recently implemented articles of the Civil Code. In this framework, the role of Adequate Structures is undeniably central. They are necessary not only to ensure the smooth operation of a solvent business but also to timely detect signs of crisis, thus preventing the risk of insolvency with all the related risks not only for directors but also for creditors, shareholders, and all stakeholders.

Download Article

The post ADEQUATE ORGANIZATIONAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, AND ACCOUNTING GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES: THE NEW FEATURES OF THE CRISIS CODE AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR DIRECTORS’ LIABILITY AND BANK RELATIONS appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Il 24 giugno 2024, il Consiglio dei ministri ha approvato il decreto legislativo per adeguare la normativa nazionale al Regolamento (UE) 2023/1114 sui mercati delle cripto-attività (MiCa). Il Decreto definisce le Autorità di Vigilanza, le sanzioni e le norme di coordinamento, rendendo il MiCa pienamente efficace e operativo in Italia.

Articolo di Paolo Barbanti Silva pubblicato su Agenda Digitale.

View the Article

The post CRIPTO-ATTIVITÀ, L’ITALIA SI ALLINEA AL REGOLAMENTO MICA: TUTTE LE NOVITÀ appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Il Markets in Crypto-assets Regulation (Mica) disciplina le cripto-attività con norme specifiche per token collegati ad attività, token di moneta elettronica e altre cripto-attività. Regola anche i prestatori di servizi e le piattaforme di negoziazione. Entrato in vigore il 29 giugno 2023, prevede diverse date di applicazione e disposizioni transitorie

Articolo di Paolo Barbanti Silva pubblicato su Agenda Digitale.

View the Article

The post REGOLAMENTO MICA: LE DATE CHIAVE DA SEGNARE appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Siamo lieti di invitarvi al nostro prossimo evento dal titolo “CRIPTOVALUTE, FRODI E CRISI SOCIETARIE – TUTELE E RIMEDI”.

🗓️ Data: mercoledì, 5 giugno 2024
🕔 Orario: a partire dalle ore 17:00

Per seguire l’evento vi saranno due modalità:
📍in presenza presso De Berti Jacchia, ingresso da Via Agnello 6/1, Milano
💻 webinar online via Zoom

L’evento è dedicato all’analisi delle novità normative europee e italiane in relazione alle tecnologie digitali e alla blockchain, con particolare attenzione alle criptovalute e ai crypto-asset.

I relatori tratteranno temi come la natura giuridica dei crypto-asset, i principali scandali e le crisi societarie nel settore, le pronunce delle corti e delle autorità di vigilanza, e l’impatto del nuovo Regolamento MiCa sui fornitori di servizi di asset virtuali (VASP) e sugli investitori.

Il seminario fornirà un approfondimento sulle nuove discipline e tutele introdotte per garantire maggiore sicurezza e trasparenza nel mercato delle criptovalute.

Tra i relatori interverranno:

👤 Armando Ambrosio – Partner di De Berti Jacchia
👤 Alessandro Foti – Senior Associate di De Berti Jacchia
👤 Paolo Barbanti Silva – Partner di De Berti Jacchia
👤 Luca CM Melchionna, Esq – Melchionna PLLC, Chair Technology and Venture Law Committee of the NYSBA Business Law Section

L’incontro è gratuito ed è necessario iscriversi inviando una email a eventi@dejalex.com per partecipare in presenza, oppure, iscrivendosi al form su Zoom per partecipare online.

Download Programme

The post CRIPTOVALUTE, FRODI E CRISI SOCIETARIE – TUTELE E RIMEDI – June 5th, 2024 appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

È stata pubblicata la classica “ITALIAN LEGAL & TAX EXCELLENCE 2024” di ClassEditori. Lo Studio e i suoi professionisti sono stati citati nella classifica.

COMPETITION LAW
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Roma)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Antonella Terranova

M&A MIDMARKET
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Milano)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Paolo Barbanti Silva

M&A SMALLCAP
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Milano)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Claudio Corba Colombo
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Marco Frazzica

EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Milano)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Paolo Barbanti Silva

PUBLIC LAW
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Roma)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Fabio Ferraro
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Antonella Terranova

TAX M&A & DEAL ADVISORY
STUDI SELECTED – De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani (Milano)
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Massimiliano Gazzo
PROFESSIONISTI SELECTED – Tiziana Zona

The post ITALIAN LEGAL & TAX EXCELLENCE 2024 appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

On 14 March 2024, following the final approval on 27 February 2024 by the Parliament of Bill S.674-B (the ‘Capital Bill’), Law No. 21 of 5 March 2024, containing measures to support the competitiveness of capital (the “Capital Law”), was published in Official Gazette No. 60 of 12 March 2024; the published text came into force on 27 March and consists of 27 articles.

The numerous interventions envisaged by the Capital Law aim to promote the modernisation of the Italian regulatory framework and to remove some obstacles to the demand for capital by companies. As reported in the Green Paper on ‘The Competitiveness of Italian Financial Markets in Support of Growth‘ (https://www.dt.mef.gov.it/it/dipartimento/consultazioni_pubbliche/consultazione_libro_verde.html), in fact, the Italian capital market is still underdeveloped compared to other advanced economies, manifesting a condition of ‘chronic lag’. This phenomenon is due both to structural weaknesses in the system of reference and to the presence of certain obstacles of legislative and regulatory nature, often common to the entire European Union area, which, compared to the other main economic areas at the international level, has a significant competitive gap, also due to the scant progress made in overcoming the fragmentation of capital markets and to a system of rules that is not always able to keep pace with the evolution of capital intermediation mechanisms.

With this in mind, the aim of the Capital Law is to facilitate the growth of the Italian capital market by favouring the access and permanence of companies in the financial markets in order to provide companies with alternative financial channels to traditional banking.

The law also delegates the Government to adopt, within twelve months, one or more legislative decrees revising the Consolidated Law on Financial Intermediation (Legislative Decree 58/1998, “Consolidated Law on Finance”) and the provisions of the Civil Code applicable to listed companies.

The main changes introduced by the Capital Law are analysed below.

1. New discipline for SMEs

1.1. Amendment to the SME definition and dematerialisation of limited liability company shares (quotas)

Article 2 of the Capital Law modifies the definition of SMEs, increasing the capitalisation threshold from the current EUR 500 million to EUR 1 billion in order to facilitate the listing of small and medium-sized companies. This change will result in the application, to a significantly larger number of companies, of the benefits deriving from the favourable rules for SMEs, including:

• the raising of the minimum threshold determining the obligation to disclose major holdings – pursuant to Article 120 of Consolidated Law on Finance – from 3% to 5%;
• the possibility to opt-out, by means of a provision in the articles of association, from the obligation of the so-called “consolidation takeover bid” (i.e., an obligation to launch a takeover bid arising from consecutive acquisitions or a voting increase of more than 5% by a person who already holds a relevant shareholding for takeover bid purposes, but not the majority of voting rights in the ordinary shareholders’ meeting), in the first five years following listing; and
• the possibility of changing, by means of a provision in the articles of association, the minimum threshold determining the obligation to launch a takeover bid (i.e. 30% of the share capital or voting rights in general), provided that the different threshold is between 25% and 40%.

In addition, Article 3 of the Capital Law introduces the possibility for SMEs established as limited liability companies (società a responsabilità limitata, “S.r.l.”) to dematerialise their shares (quotas). The dematerialisation is structured on the basis of electronic data entries with an intermediary through which the shares will be registered.

This is an innovation that entails an important departure from the codified rules for the transfer of S.r.l. quotas, which require a notarised private deed and subsequent filing with the relevant Companies Register. Now the dematerialised quotas of S.r.l. – SMEs will be able to circulate on the basis of deeds between intermediaries. On the other hand, the S.r.l. whose quotas will be dematerialised will have to set up a shareholders’ register to record the various shareholding transactions, as there is no provision for them to be filed with the Companies Register.

Amendments to the Rules on the Issue of Bonds by joint stock companies and Debt Securities by limited liability companies

Worth mentioning are the amendments to Articles 2412 and 2483 of the Civil Code by Article 7 of the Capital Law, aimed at facilitating the raising of financial resources by corporations.

In particular:

• with reference to joint stock companies (società per azioni, “S.p.A.”), the amendment of the fifth paragraph of Article 2412 of the Civil Code, which now provides that the limitations set forth in the first two subsections of Article 2412 of the Civil Code (i.e., the limits on the issuance of bonds for an amount not exceeding a total of twice the share capital, the legal reserve and the available reserves resulting from the latest approved financial statements) do not apply to issues of bonds intended to be subscribed exclusively by professional investors; and (ii) the obligation to be liable for the solvency of the issuing company in the event of a subsequent transfer of the bonds;
• on the subject of the issuance of debt securities by S.r.l., the amendment of paragraph 2 of Article 2483 of the Civil Code, which provides that the obligation of interposition for the purpose of guaranteeing solvency by a professional investor subject to prudential supervision does not apply to bonds intended to be acquired exclusively by professional investors.

2. Multiple and Increased Voting Shares

2.1. Multiple-voting shares

Article 13 of the Capital Law amends Article 2351(4) of the Civil Code, providing for an increase from 3 to 10 in the number of votes that may be assigned, by provision in the articles of association, to each multiple-vote share.

In line with Article 127-sexies of Consolidated Law on Finance, which allows the issuance of multiple-vote shares only prior to listing, the amendment will only affect companies that are not listed yet, while for companies whose shares are already listed, the prohibition to introduce multiple-vote shares into the bylaws will remain.

2.2. Increased voting shares

Article 14 of the Capital Law amends the regulation of the increased vote provided for by the Consolidated Law on Finance in order to provide that the articles of association may provide for the allocation of votes in addition to the 2 votes per share provided for by the current regulation.

In more detail, the law amends:

• Article 106 of the Consolidated Law on Finance by adding paragraph 5-bis, which eliminates the obligation to launch a takeover bid in the event that the relevant thresholds are exceeded due to an increase in voting rights as a result of a merger, cross-border transformation or proportional demerger, carried out pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 19/2023, provided that there is no change in the direct or indirect control over the company resulting from the aforementioned transactions;
• Article 127-quinquies of Consolidated Law on Finance by providing:
  • in subsection 1, that the articles of association may provide that an increased voting right, up to a maximum of two votes, be attached to each share held by the same person for a continuous period of not less than 24 months;
  • in subsection 2, that the articles of association may provide for the allocation of one additional vote upon expiry of each 12-month period, following the expiration of the period referred to in subsection 1, in which the share has belonged to the same person, up to a total maximum of 10 votes per share;
  • in Section 3, the possibility of including a provision in the statutes to the effect that the person entitled to vote may irrevocably waive, in whole or in part, the increased voting right.

The introduction into the articles of association of the provision permitting the further increase up to an overall maximum of 10 votes per share is intended to favour the position of the ‘loyal’ shareholder in the interest of industrial policies of sustainable growth and long-term value creation, with positive effects on the financing of companies, their capitalisation and market development.

3. Corporate governance

The area in which the Capital Law has had the greatest impact – as already seen in light of the above-mentioned changes on multiple and increased voting – is that relating to the governance of listed companies. In particular, there are important changes in the following areas: (i) the list of the Board of Directors; and (ii) conduct of shareholders’ meetings through the appointed representative.

3.1. Board List

With reference to the appointment of the Board of Directors, Article 12 of the Capital Law introduces the new Article 147-ter of the Consolidated Law on Finance, providing for specific rules for the submission of lists by the Board of Directors of listed companies on the occasion of its renewal.

In particular, it is established that, if provided for in the bylaws, the outgoing board of directors may submit a list of candidates to be elected to the new board of directors, provided that (i) the resolution on the submission of the list is passed with the favourable vote of at least two-thirds of the members of the outgoing board of directors; (ii) the number of members of the list is equal to the number of members to be elected plus one-third; and (iii) the list is made public and filed at least 40 days prior to the date of the shareholders’ meeting.

If the list of the outgoing Board of Directors is the only one submitted, the directors to be elected shall be drawn in full from it.

If, however, there are other lists, the law regulates in detail – in paragraph 3 of the same article – how to proceed.

In particular, if the list of the outgoing Board of Directors obtains the highest number of votes cast:

• there will be a further individual vote on each candidate at the same meeting;
• the candidates will be ordered according to the number of votes obtained by each of them (i.e. from highest to lowest);
• the candidates obtaining the highest number of votes, in proportion to the posts to be filled, shall be elected; and
• in the event of a tie between candidates, the order in which they appear on the list shall be used.

Furthermore, in the event that the aforementioned list is the one with the most votes, but there are also minority lists, the members of the new Board of Directors will be elected from the other lists as follows:

• if the total number of votes received by the first 2 lists after the majority one, is no more than 20% of the total votes cast, the aforesaid 2 lists shall compete for the allocation of seats on the Board of Directors in proportion to the votes cast by each list at the shareholders’ meeting, and in any case for a total amount of no less than 20% of the total number of members of the same body (so-called minority bonus). The remaining seats on the Board of Directors are allocated to the list with the highest number of votes, and the relevant candidates are voted by the Shareholders’ Meeting in the same manner as explained above;
• if the total number of votes collected at the shareholders’ meeting by the other 2 first lists after the majority one, exceeds 20 per cent of the total votes cast, the members of the new Board of Directors pertaining to minorities shall be assigned in proportion to the votes obtained by the minority lists that obtained a percentage of votes of no less than 3 per cent;
• in both cases, the remaining members will be allocated to the list of the outgoing Board of Directors.

These new rules, which will apply as of the first shareholders’ meeting convened after 1 January 2025, present several application criticalities and grey areas, including – for example – the modalities for the distribution in the event that the Board of Directors’ list does not obtain the highest number of votes at the shareholders’ meeting. The implementing provisions of the law, which will be published shortly by Consob, may shed light on these still unclear aspects.

3.2. Conduct of meetings through appointed representative

Through the introduction – by Article 11 of the Capital Law – of the new Article 135-undecies of the Consolidated Law on Finance, companies with shares listed on a regulated market or admitted to trading on a multilateral trading system are allowed to provide in their articles of association that shareholders’ meetings may be held exclusively through their appointed representative. Pursuant to Article 135-novies of Consolidated Law on Finance, the representative may also be granted proxies and sub-delegations.

If this measure is adopted, it is further stipulated that:

• proposals for resolutions may not be submitted to the assembly through an appointed representative;
• those entitled to vote may individually submit proposals for resolutions on items on the agenda (or proposals whose resolution is otherwise permitted by law) no later than the 15th day prior to the meeting in first or single call;
• proposals are published on the company’s website within 2 days after the deadline;
• the entitlement to submit individual resolution proposals is subject to the company’s receipt of the notice from the intermediary referred to in Article 83-sexies of Consolidated Law on Finance; and
• the right to ask questions shall only be exercised prior to the meeting and the company shall provide answers at least three days before the meeting.

4. Further measures to facilitate companies’ access to the capital markets

The Capital Law, as mentioned, has as its main objective to facilitate the access and permanence of companies in the financial markets. The legislator sought to encourage the listing of new companies and to simplify the rules for already listed companies, including by removing certain forms of gold plating. Below are the main measures that go in this direction.

4.1 Amendments to the rules for the approval of the prospectus and responsibility of the placement agent

Article 94(2) of the Consolidated Law on Finance is amended, establishing that the terms for the approval of the prospectus shall run from the date of submission of the draft. If Consob ascertains that the draft prospectus does not meet the criteria of completeness, comprehensibility and consistency necessary for its approval or that amendments or additional information are required, the procedure and terms set forth in Article 20(4) of Regulation 2017/1129/EU (Prospectus Regulation) shall apply. The purpose of the amendment is, therefore, to reduce interpretative uncertainty as to the point in time from which the deadlines for approval of the prospectus run, which is thus made to coincide with the date of submission of the draft prospectus and not at the point in time when the Authority deems the application complete.

Furthermore, in order to align the Italian regulations with the European ones, paragraph 7 of Article 94 of the Consolidated Law on Finance, which provided for the placement agent’s liability in the event of false information or omissions capable of influencing the decisions of a potential investor, is repealed.

4.2. Door-to-door off-site offer

Article 30(2) of the Consolidated Law on Finance is supplemented by introducing a new hypothesis that is not considered as an offer outside the place of business (door-to-door) and, therefore, is not subject to the relevant rules.

In particular, the exemption has been extended to off-premises offers for the sale or subscription of its own shares provided that (i) the shares are issued by issuers with shares traded on regulated markets or multilateral trading facilities in Italy or in EU countries, and (ii) they are made by the issuer through its directors or its managerial staff for subscription or purchase amounts greater than or equal to EUR 250,000.

4.3. Simplified listing

The Capital Law eliminates several conditions previously required for listing on the financial markets. In particular, through the amendment of Article 66 bis of Consolidated Law on Finance, it eliminates (i) the criteria identified by Consob regarding accounting transparency and the adequacy of the organisational structure and internal control system that subsidiaries, established and regulated by the laws of non-EU states, must comply with in order for the parent company’s shares to be listed on an Italian regulated market; and (ii) the limits – again outlined by Consob – for the admission to listing on the Italian securities market of financial companies whose assets consist exclusively of equity investments.

4.4. Float regulations

Article 6 of the Capital Law amends Article 112 of the Consolidated Law on Finance, abolishing the power attributed to Consob to reduce the free float when a shareholder with more than 90 per cent of the capital represented by securities admitted to trading on a regulated market is required to restore a free float sufficient to ensure the regular course of trading.

5. Repeal of the obligation to report transactions by material shareholders

Article 10 of the Capital Law abolishes the obligation to report transactions carried out by material shareholders to Consob. In particular, the provision repeals paragraph 7 of Article 114 of Consolidated Law on Finance, effectively abolishing the obligation for anyone holding at least 10 per cent of the share capital of a listed company, as well as for any other person who controls the issuer, including through an intermediary, to report to Consob and to the public on transactions involving shares issued by the company.

This measure aims both to align the Italian regulatory framework with the European one and to streamline the procedure for transactions involving shares issued by the issuer or other financial instruments linked to them.

6. Measures relating to sanction proceedings handled by Consob

A reform aimed at optimising the efficiency and functioning of the financial markets could not be separated from a revision of the sanctioning system within the remit of the relevant Supervisory Authorities.

With this in mind, Article 23 of the Capital Law inserts a new title in the Consolidated Law on Finance, containing provisions common to all sanctioning measures that can be imposed by Consob and which allow the sanctioning procedure to be defined in a negotiated manner.

In a nutshell, the addressee of a notice contesting sanctions is allowed to submit commitments such that the harm to the interests of investors and the market that is the subject of the contestation is removed. Consob must then assess the suitability of such commitments to achieve the intended objective and consequently issue a decision with binding commitments. In the event of non-compliance with the commitments made, the maximum limits of the administrative pecuniary sanction provided for in the relevant regulations are increased by 10 per cent.

The provision, which allows for negotiated solutions to disputes on financial markets, aims to achieve a reduction in the number of disputes between Consob and supervised entities in order to simplify and make the activity of the Supervisory Authority more efficient and to facilitate the remedy of any critical situations.

7. Some final considerations

The Capital Law has certainly introduced a number of significant innovations in the area of company law and capital markets, providing more tools and more flexibility for companies to meet their financial and governance needs. It is, however, a first step towards a more organic reform of the entire discipline of the law on listed companies, with a view to making the legislation more competitive with that of other jurisdictions and more homogeneous at the EU level so as to foster the development of a single capital market. The Capital Law (Article 19) in fact contains a delegation to the government to adopt, within 12 months, legislative decrees for the overall revision of capital market regulations. In addition, the Italian regulations will have to be coordinated to the so-called Listing Act, a series of regulations with important innovations aimed at reforming the capital market rules at the EU level, which is expected to be approved soon.    

Download Article

The post THE MAIN INNOVATIONS OF THE SO-CALLED CAPITAL LAW appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Riportiamo di seguito il commento dell'avv. Paolo Barbanti Silva pubblicato nell'articolo di Alberto Grifone su ItaliaOggi Sette

«Negli ultimi anni ho seguito prevalentemente operazioni di delisting, peraltro alcune relative a società che si erano quotate solo di recente», dice Paolo Barbanti Silva partner di De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

«Mi riferisco, in particolare, a CFT, che dopo essere stata quotata sul mercato Egm (ex -Aim) mediante lo strumento della Spac, nel 2022 è stata oggetto di Opa con delisting da parte di un soggetto industriale, e, nel 2023, a Prima Industrie, anch'essa oggetto di Opa e delisting con acquisto del controllo da parte di fondi di private equity. Nel 2021 avevo seguito l'aumento di capitale di Cattolica Assicurazioni, ma anch'essa è stata successivamente oggetto di Opa da parte di Assicurazioni Generali e poi delisting.

I numerosi delisting degli anni scorsi erano dovuti alle condizioni di mercato particolarmente favorevoli, essendo i corsi azionari particolarmente bassi, e all'esigenza di soggetti industriali o dei fondi di investimento di sottrarsi a una regolamentazione particolarmente onerosa e penalizzante.
L'attuale fase di crescita azionaria, legata anche alle aspettative di ribasso dei tassi di interesse, unita agli interventi normativi a favore dello sviluppo dei mercati finanziari, potrebbero fare ripartire la stagione delle lpo (che, in realtà, non si è mai spenta ma che è stata oscurata dai numerosi delisting) nel 2024».

Sulle novità legislative in divenire, Barbanti Silva aggiunge: «vedo con partico­lare interesse la disciplina del voto plurimo e del voto maggiorato, che potrebbero convincere gli imprenditori a rivolgersi al mercato dei capitali piuttosto che al mercato bancario o del debito, in quanto tali strumenti possono permettere il mantenimento del controllo da parte dei soci di riferimento senza rinunciare all'apporto di risorse di equity che favorirebbero la crescita delle imprese.
Allo stesso modo, l'ampliamento della definizione di PMI e la possibilità di dematerializzare anche le quote di S.r. l . potrà favorire l'accesso al mercato dei capitali anche a quelle piccole e medie imprese con sono la spina dorsale del nostro sistema industriale.

A livello Ue il Listing Act in parte si sovrappone al ddi capitali, e questo potrebbe portare a una situazione di incertezza normativa che, come spesso capita in questi casi, non giova alla crescita economica. Lo stesso ddl capitali prevede, tuttavia , che nei mesi successivi alla sua approvazione, sia effettuato un riordino complessivo del Testo Unico della Finanza, per cui questo potrebbe essere l'occasione per un'armonizzazione complessiva anche alla luce della normativa comunitaria. Inoltre, una maggiore uniformità delle normative dei singoli paesi può favori re lo sviluppo di vero mercato unico dei capitali a livello europeo, con il superamento del nanismo che ci caratterizza rispetto ad altre economie e la possibilità anche per le imprese italiane di attingere a maggiori fonti di finanziamento della propria crescita».

VAI ALL'ARTICOLO COMPLETO

The post IPO, NUOVE QUOTAZIONI IN VISTA ANCHE GRAZIE AL BONUS RINNOVATO appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Riportiamo di seguito il commento dell'avv. Paolo Barbanti Silva pubblicato nell'articolo di Raffaella Ulgheri su FundsPeople

«Raccogliere le posizioni degli operatori su alcune delle tematiche più rilevanti della SFDR, emerse dopo il primo periodo di applicazione della nuova normativa, quali la qualifica dei fondi ex art. 8 ed ex art. 9, e l’applicazione degli obblighi di informativa non solo ai prodotti ma anche agli emittenti», dice Paolo Barbanti Silva partner di De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.

Barbanti Silva sottolinea come SFDR, “seppur condivisibile negli obiettivi, ha creato in tempi rapidissimi un voluminoso corpus di regole, anche di dettaglio tecnico, e la loro metabolizzazione da parte degli operatori e del mercato non è semplice”. In quest’ottica, la consultazione “è utile per apportare i miglioramenti e le semplificazioni ritenute opportune a seguito di un primo periodo di applicazione delle nuove norme, per cui le proposte di modifica degli RTS dovrebbero coordinarsi con la possibile modifica della normativa primaria e non far correre il rischio di introdurre ulteriori obblighi intermedi di adeguamento, con i connessi costi, in un momento in cui, per l’appunto, si sta ancora metabolizzando la nuova, complessa e dirompente disciplina”.

VAI ALL'ARTICOLO COMPLETO

The post NORMATIVA ESG, A CHE PUNTO SIAMO IN EUROPA NEL 2024 appeared first on Studio Legale De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani.